A) An ultra-hazardous activity is involved.
B) The defendant had exclusive control of the thing that caused the harm.
C) The harm would normally not have occurred without negligence.
D) The plaintiff had no role in causing the harm.
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) larceny.
B) trespass.
C) misrepresentation.
D) conversion.
Correct Answer
verified
A) Adam committed an assault but not a battery.
B) Adam committed a battery but not an assault.
C) Adam committed an assault and a battery.
D) Adam committed neither an assault nor a battery since he used a candy gun and was only playing a joke on Linda.
Correct Answer
verified
A) defamatory statement;falseness;communication;and injury.
B) a contract;knowledge of the contract;improper inducement;injury.
C) false or misleading fact statements;statements in commercial advertising;likelihood of harm.
D) duty;breach of duty;proximate causation;and damages.
Correct Answer
verified
A) Angela will be able to submit the additional medical bills to the court for payment.
B) Tom will have to pay the additional medical bills.
C) Tom will have a qualified privilege and only have to pay a portion of the additional medical expenses.
D) Angela will have no recourse against Tom or the court for the medical expenses as long as the original award was reasonable.
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) is unforeseeable.
B) arises intentionally.
C) arises by accident.
D) is always substantial.
Correct Answer
verified
A) a battery,but not an assault.
B) an assault,but not a battery.
C) both an assault and a battery.
D) neither an assault nor a battery.
Correct Answer
verified
A) A tortious act is always a criminal act.
B) A criminal act is always a tortious act.
C) A tortious act may also be a criminal act.
D) All the above are correct.
Correct Answer
verified
A) Punitive awards should not exceed compensatory damages by more than a factor of nine.
B) The Supreme Court has not set any limits for punitive awards.
C) Punitive awards should not exceed compensatory damages by more than a factor of one hundred.
D) The Supreme Court has stated that punitive damages are allowed only when there are no compensatory damages awarded.
Correct Answer
verified
A) does not violate the Lanham Act because of the First Amendment freedom of speech.
B) does not violate the Lanham Act because Wholesome did not act with actual malice.
C) does not violate the Lanham Act because comparative ads are exempt from the law.
D) violates the Lanham Act.
Correct Answer
verified
A) A plaintiff must show that the defendant's act was both the factual cause of her injury as well as a foreseeable injury.
B) A plaintiff must show that the defendant's act was the factual cause of her injury even if the injury was not foreseeable.
C) A plaintiff must show that the defendant's act created a foreseeable danger even if it was not the factual cause of her injury.
D) A plaintiff does not have to show that the defendant's act either created a foreseeable danger or that the act was the factual cause of her injury.
Correct Answer
verified
A) intrusion.
B) defamation.
C) commercial exploitation.
D) none of the above,since public figures are often imitated by other actors.
Correct Answer
verified
A) Trein is liable for tortious interference with a contract.
B) Mia is liable for tortious interference with a contract.
C) E-presto is liable for tortious interference with a contract.
D) Both Mia and E-presto are liable for tortious interference with a contract.
Correct Answer
verified
A) she will need to show that the magazine has a history of being "reckless" with facts on a regular basis.
B) she will need to show that the magazine either knew the story was false or acted with reckless disregard of the facts.
C) she will need to show that the magazine failed to attempt to verify the story by trying to contact her or her agent before the story was printed.
D) she will need to show that the magazine could have discovered that the story was false but failed to do so.
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
A) The punitive award is excessive because it exceeds the Supreme Court's suggested ratio of compensatory damages to punitive damages.
B) The punitive award is excessive because the Supreme Court has stated that the trial court may not use the defendant's wealth as an excuse to award an unreasonably high award.
C) The punitive award is excessive both because of the ratio of compensatory damages to punitive damages and because the punitive damage award was based partly on the defendant's wealth.
D) The jury award is not excessive based on the Supreme Court's guidelines.
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 45
Related Exams