A) While CRA only deals with unfair terms in consumer contracts, UCTA applies to both consumer and business-to-business contracts.
B) Both UCTA and CRA deal with consumer contracts. CRA also deals with business-to-business contracts.
C) Both UCTA and CRA apply to consumer contracts as well as business-to-business contracts.
D) Only UCTA deals with unfair terms in business-to-business contracts. CRA deals only with consumer contracts.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The reasonableness test does not apply to terms that limit or exclude liability for personal injury or death caused by negligence.
B) The reasonableness test does not apply to terms that limit or exclude liability for breach of implied terms as to title to goods, but does apply to terms that limit or exclude liability for breach of other statutory implied terms
C) The reasonableness test does not apply to terms that limit or exclude liability for breach of contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Under CRA, the CMA and other 'regulators' may apply to the courts for an injunction against the future use of specific unfair terms. The CMA cannot intervene for past use of unfair terms.
B) Under CRA, the CMA can challenge both the future use of an unfair term and seek damages for past infringements.
C) Under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) , the CMA may challenge unreasonable terms in consumer contracts and unreasonable indemnities.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A notice in big letters at the entrance to a swimming pool.
B) A contract for a rental car which needs to be signed by the customer before the contract can be completed.
C) A salesman of company B Ltd informing the directing manager of company A Ltd.
D) Never.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) In both UCTA and CRA, the burden of proving unreasonableness/unfairness is on the party challenging the term.
B) In both UCTA and CRA, the burden of proving reasonableness/fairness is on the party wishing to enforce the term.
C) In UCTA, the burden of proving unreasonableness is on the party challenging the term. In CRA, the burden of proving fairness is on the party wishing to enforce the term (the supplier) .
D) CRA is neutral as to which party must prove unfairness. In UCTA, the burden of proving reasonableness is on the party wishing to enforce the term.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A term is only unfair if there is procedural unfairness.
B) A term is unfair even if there is no procedural unfairness; substantive unfairness may be enough.
C) A term is only unfair if there is procedural unfairness, substantive unfairness is merely an indication of procedural unfairness.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A term which is not in plain and intelligible language is automatically invalid.
B) A price variation clause is a 'core' term and automatically immune from review for unfairness.
C) A consumer contract tainted by an unfair term may nevertheless continue to bind the contract parties if it is capable of continuing in existence without the unfair term.
D) All of the options given are correct.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) For a term to be a non-reviewable 'core' term under CRA, it must be a 'core' provision or part of the 'essential' bargain.
B) A term may be 'core' under CRA, and thus exempt from control, even if it relates to only part of a contract party's remuneration, and even if it is not an 'essential' part of the bargain.
C) Terms which allow a trader to increase its price without giving the consumer the right to cancel the contract relate to the adequacy of the price or remuneration, and thus are 'core' non-reviewable terms under CRA.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, the exemption was not agreed to in writing.
B) No, UCTA prohibits exemptions for liability for death or personal injury. The clause is invalid.
C) No, a clause excluding or limiting the legal liability of a seller in the event of the death or personal injury of the consumer is considered indicatively unfair under CRA and not binding.
D) Yes.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A chauffeur crashes a shuttle bus into a passenger's parked car. The owner of the car sues Anglia Airways. Anglia sues Luxor Drivers. Luxor Drives relies on the clause.
B) A chauffeur accidentally hits a pedestrian with the shuttle bus. The pedestrian later dies in hospital. His widow sues Anglia Airways. Anglia sues Luxor Drivers. Luxor Drivers relies on the clause.
C) A chauffeur crashes a shuttle bus into a baggage transport owned by Anglia. Anglia Airways sues Luxor Drivers. Luxor Drivers relies on the clause.
D) All of the options given are correct.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Terms that make claims more difficult to prove.
B) Terms allowing one party the discretion to give substantially different performance from that reasonably expected by the other contract party.
C) Terms that exclude or restrict (i) a duty of care in negligence, or (ii) the implied obligations under the Sale of Goods Act 1979.
D) None of the options given is correct.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The existence of direct control over terms means that it is no longer necessary to consider whether a term is incorporated or is wide enough to cover the events in question.
B) Direct statutory control over terms has reduced the need to manipulate the questions of incorporation and interpretation in order to avoid unfairness.
C) Only the party seeking to invalidate the term can sue under UCTA and CRA
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, Sudbury & Jones purchased the cars as consumers. The clause is unenforceable under Part 1 CRA, which provides that certain terms, including as to satisfactory quality and fitness for purpose, are to be 'treated as included'.
B) Yes, when Sudbury & Jones purchased the cars it dealt as a consumer. The clause is outright invalid under UCTA.
C) Sudbury & Jones did not purchase the cars as consumers. The term is only invalid if it is not reasonable under section 6(3) . UCTA.
D) No, neither UCTA nor CRA are applicable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes.
B) No, it has not been validly incorporated.
C) No, it is unreasonable and invalid under UCTA.
D) No, it is unfair and not binding under CRA.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Terms which have the object or effect of requiring any consumer who fails to fulfil his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation (Para 6) .
B) Terms which have the object or effect of irrevocably binding the consumer to terms with which he had no real opportunity of becoming acquainted before the conclusion of the contract (Para 10) .
C) Terms which have the object or effect of giving the seller or supplier the right to determine whether the goods or services supplied are in conformity with the contract, or giving him the exclusive right to interpret any term of the contract (Para 16) .
D) All of the options given are correct.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 15 of 15
Related Exams