FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 17: Equitable Remedies and Proprietary Estoppel

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study Flashcards

Question 21

Short Answer

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Which case held that a promise on the part of the defendant did not have to be irrevocable?

Correct Answer

Answered by ExamLex AI

The case that held that a promise on the...

View Answer

Show Answer

Question 22

Short Answer

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Which section of the Wills Act 1837 provides that no will can be valid unless it is in writing, signed by the testator and witnessed by at least two witnesses present at the same time?

Correct Answer

Answered by ExamLex AI

The section of the Wills Act 1837 that p...

View Answer

Show Answer

Question 23

Short Answer

Review LaterAdd Note

Aside from an action against the trustee for breach of trust, how else can the beneficiary recover what they are owed?

Which section of the Law of Property Act 1925 provides that constructive trusts do not need to be evidenced in writing?

What was held to be a direct contribution to the purchase price in Midland Bank plc v Cooke (1995) 27 HLR 733?

Which case held that when establishing a Lloyds Bank v Rosset 'category two' trust, the non-legally owning party must establish a common intention to share the property by conduct?

How much detrimental reliance is needed for the non-legally owning party to establish a constructive trust?

In which case was it held that the words relied on for a proprietary estoppel claim could not be too general and must relate to the specific property in question?

To claim an equitable remedy, the claimant must show that common law damages will not be an adequate remedy in their own right.

What does constitution of a trust mean?

Name a situation where it may not be worthwhile for a beneficiary to bring an action against the trustee for breach of trust?

Equitable remedies are only awarded in exceptional circumstances, when an award of damages at common law would not adequately compensate the claimant.

Detrimental reliance can only come after the representation.

The court will never allow mistakes to be changed in documents.