Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) the fact that the damage to the plaintiff was slight compared with the defendant's expense of abating the condition was not a good reason for refusing an injunction
B) the fact that the damage to the plaintiff was slight compared with the defendant's expense of abating the condition was a good reason for refusing an injunction
C) since the damage to the plaintiff was slight,there was no case
D) since the damage to the plaintiff was slight,so the defendant should not have to pay damages
E) the plaintiff did not have any rights with regard to the water flowing through his property
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) EPA's rule that bills each party according to estimated portion of volume contributed
B) EPA's rule that bills each party according to estimated portion of toxic volume contributed
C) joint and several liabilities,whereby any one party could pay the entire bill
D) contribution rule,whereby each responsible party pays an equal portion of the entire bill
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) urban blight
B) urban Superfunds
C) urban toxic abandonment
D) brownfields
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) set pollution standards
B) enforce cooperation among the states on the issue of air pollution control
C) control air quality in public buildings and workplaces
D) set pollution standards and enforce cooperation among the states on the issue of air pollution control
E) set pollution standards and enforce cooperation among the states on the issue of air pollution control and control air quality in public buildings and workplaces
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) no longer mattered,as it participated in the permit process,and that was ended
B) was appropriate to continue monitoring performance,but since the developer was in compliance with the permits,it could not block progress
C) meant the permits would be cancelled,as the Center was not allowed to participate in the permit consideration process
D) was beyond what was allowed by law,which imposed needless costs on the developer,so it would pay the attorney fees the developer incurred
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) there was not time
B) the Clinton administration did not want it to pass
C) it would not have passed
D) it would have caused dissent within the Senate
E) it was not a legally binding treaty
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) conversion
B) private environmental trespass
C) trespass
D) negligence
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) dumping a pollutant in navigable waters
B) moving water from one navigable water to another
C) swimming in navigable water
D) both a and b require permits
E) none of the other choices require a permit
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) an unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of one's land
B) a term applied to a polluter who causes damage to the air
C) a concept no longer used because of the Clean Air Act
D) an unreasonable interference with a right held by members of the public in common
E) repealed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) greenhouse gases
B) lightning
C) burning coal
D) vehicle exhaust
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) cooperation with the government in investigations
B) voluntary reporting of illegal actions
C) assistance to those who suffer from environmental wrongdoing
D) all of the other specific choices could lead to a reduction in penalties
E) none of the other specific choices could lead to a reduction in penalties
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) no presumption of innocence,the EPA need not show a chemical poses a health hazard before restricting or banning it
B) a presumption of innocence,the EPA must show a chemical poses a health hazard before restricting or banning it
C) a presumption of innocence,but the firm producing the chemical must prove that there is no health hazard
D) no presumption of innocence,the firm producing the chemical must show that it is no health hazard before it begins production
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 141 - 160 of 506
Related Exams