Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Section 2 of the Sherman Act outlaws monopolies because monopolists have the power to fix prices unilaterally.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The following statements pertain to alleged violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.Which statement is accurate?


A) Although tying agreements are classified as per se violations of Section 1,the judicial treatment given to them differs from pure per se treatment.
B) Because vertical restraints on distribution necessarily harm intrabrand competition,they are considered per se violations of Section 1.
C) Because group boycotts amount to reprehensible conduct that cannot have competitive justification,all such agreements are considered per se violations of Section 1.
D) Although concerted action ordinarily has been required in order for there to have been a violation of Section 1,the Supreme Court recently dispensed with the requirement in price-fixing cases.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The National Cooperative Research Act (NCRA) that applies to joint research and development ventures (JRDVs) :


A) provides that treble damages may be recovered for losses flowing from a JRDV ultimately found to be in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
B) requires firms contemplating a JRDV to provide the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission with advance notice of their intent to do so.
C) lacks provisions to allow the parties to a challenged JRDV to recover attorney's fees from an unsuccessful challenger.
D) requires application of a per se rule,rather than a reasonableness standard,when a JRDV's legality is determined.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The passage of the antitrust laws reflected a congressional assumption that competition was most likely to exist in an oligopolistic industrial structure.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A nolo plea or a consent decree is often attractive to antitrust defendants because:


A) the government must prove criminal intent on the defendant's part.
B) it results in an imposition of a penalty without requiring a defendant to remedy his actions.
C) it is not admissible as proof of a violation of the Sherman Act in a private plaintiff's later civil suit.
D) it does not attract the same penalty as a guilty plea or a conviction at trial.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

When is proof of joint action required for violation of Section 1 of Sherman Act?


A) When a firm enters into an exclusive dealing agreement with a supplier.
B) When more than one firm is charged with a conspiracy to monopolize.
C) Charges of monopolization do not require any proof of joint action.
D) When a firm possesses not only monopoly power but also intent to monopolize.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

________ agreements reduce a manufacturer's sales costs and provide dealers with a secure source of supply.


A) Joint venture
B) Exclusive dealing
C) Reciprocal dealing
D) Formal written

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following applies federal antitrust laws to only behavior having some significant impact on interstate or foreign business?


A) The Clayton Act
B) The Sherman Act
C) Federal Trade Commission Act
D) The Commerce Clause of the U.S.Constitution

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

SuperMart Inc.operates a franchise operation.Mr.Jones purchased a right to open a SuperMart but the agreement has a vertical restraint,Mr.Jones is not allowed to market or seek customers beyond 25 miles of his franchise store.This agreement is per se illegal.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following situations is most likely to be deemed in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act?


A) Intent to monopolize
B) Attempted monopolization
C) Misdirected monopolization
D) Conspiracy to monopolize

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Overbearing,Inc. ,which manufactures ball bearings,has built up a network of wholesale dealers.Under agreements between Overbearing and various dealers,each dealer has an established geographical territory of operation.These agreements also call for the individual dealers not to compete in another Overbearing dealer's exclusive territory.An appropriate plaintiff has sued Overbearing on the theory that these agreements violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act.What treatment will the court give the agreements? Why? Under that treatment,is it possible for Overbearing to avoid liability even if the plaintiff establishes the existence of the agreements? If so,how?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Because the agreements are vertical rest...

View Answer

Before a court can determine a defendant's market share,it must first define the relevant market.One of the components of a relevant market determination is the relevant:


A) resource market.
B) supply market.
C) geographic market.
D) competitive market.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

It is per se illegal for competitors to make an agreement to split up a geographical area and not to directly compete against each other.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Intent to monopolize is necessary to prove a violation under the Sherman Act.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Courts tend to treat ________ similarly because they are similar in motivation and effect.


A) exclusive dealing agreements and reciprocal dealing agreements
B) joint venture agreements and exclusive dealing agreements
C) joint venture agreements and tying agreements
D) reciprocal dealing agreements and tying agreements

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Methods of antitrust analysis are commonly called Chicago School theories because many of their major premises were advanced by scholars affiliated with:


A) Loyola University.
B) Chicago State University.
C) the University of Chicago.
D) the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Sherman Act violations may give rise to civil litigation only.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

As per the Colgate doctrine,a manufacturer cannot unilaterally refuse to deal with those who fail to follow the manufacturer's suggested resale prices.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following has no other purpose or effect except to restrain competition?


A) Naked vertical restraints
B) Naked horizontal restraints
C) Ancillary vertical restraints
D) Ancillary horizontal restraints

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In analyzing vertical restraints on distribution,courts today will apply what analysis?


A) The rule of reason
B) Finding that any evidence of vertical restraint is per se illegal
C) Federal courts will not consider issue,deferring it to international courts
D) Applying the strict scrutiny test

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 61 - 80 of 90

Related Exams

Show Answer