Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Although tying agreements are classified as per se violations of Section 1,the judicial treatment given to them differs from pure per se treatment.
B) Because vertical restraints on distribution necessarily harm intrabrand competition,they are considered per se violations of Section 1.
C) Because group boycotts amount to reprehensible conduct that cannot have competitive justification,all such agreements are considered per se violations of Section 1.
D) Although concerted action ordinarily has been required in order for there to have been a violation of Section 1,the Supreme Court recently dispensed with the requirement in price-fixing cases.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) provides that treble damages may be recovered for losses flowing from a JRDV ultimately found to be in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
B) requires firms contemplating a JRDV to provide the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission with advance notice of their intent to do so.
C) lacks provisions to allow the parties to a challenged JRDV to recover attorney's fees from an unsuccessful challenger.
D) requires application of a per se rule,rather than a reasonableness standard,when a JRDV's legality is determined.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) the government must prove criminal intent on the defendant's part.
B) it results in an imposition of a penalty without requiring a defendant to remedy his actions.
C) it is not admissible as proof of a violation of the Sherman Act in a private plaintiff's later civil suit.
D) it does not attract the same penalty as a guilty plea or a conviction at trial.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) When a firm enters into an exclusive dealing agreement with a supplier.
B) When more than one firm is charged with a conspiracy to monopolize.
C) Charges of monopolization do not require any proof of joint action.
D) When a firm possesses not only monopoly power but also intent to monopolize.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Joint venture
B) Exclusive dealing
C) Reciprocal dealing
D) Formal written
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Clayton Act
B) The Sherman Act
C) Federal Trade Commission Act
D) The Commerce Clause of the U.S.Constitution
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Intent to monopolize
B) Attempted monopolization
C) Misdirected monopolization
D) Conspiracy to monopolize
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) resource market.
B) supply market.
C) geographic market.
D) competitive market.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) exclusive dealing agreements and reciprocal dealing agreements
B) joint venture agreements and exclusive dealing agreements
C) joint venture agreements and tying agreements
D) reciprocal dealing agreements and tying agreements
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Loyola University.
B) Chicago State University.
C) the University of Chicago.
D) the University of Illinois at Chicago.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Naked vertical restraints
B) Naked horizontal restraints
C) Ancillary vertical restraints
D) Ancillary horizontal restraints
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The rule of reason
B) Finding that any evidence of vertical restraint is per se illegal
C) Federal courts will not consider issue,deferring it to international courts
D) Applying the strict scrutiny test
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams