A) Equal Pay Act of 1963
B) Americans with Disabilities Act
C) Disabled Discrimination Act
D) Disabled Discrimination and Employment Act of 1967
E) Disabled Americans Act
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Skill
B) Working conditions
C) Time
D) Responsibility
E) Effort
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) At any time after 90 days have elapsed since the filing of the charge.
B) At any time after the charge is filed.
C) At any time after 60 days have elapsed since the filing of the charge.
D) At any time after 180 days have elapsed since the filing of the charge.
E) The plaintiff does not have the right to request a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An employer may only be held liable in such cases if quid pro quo harassment is involved.
B) An employer may only be held liable in such cases if disparate-impact harassment is involved.
C) An employer cannot be held liable in such cases because the employer has no control over the nonemployee.
D) An employer is liable as a matter of law in such cases because an employer has an absolute duty to provide a work environment that is free of harassment.
E) An employer may be held liable in such cases if the employer knows that a customer repeatedly harasses an employee,yet the employer does nothing to remedy the situation.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The retirement exemption
B) The executive exemption
C) The guaranteed income stream exemption
D) The forfeiture exemption
E) There is no such exemption
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The burden shifts to the defendant to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that discrimination did not occur.
B) The burden shifts to the defendant to articulate a legitimate,nondiscriminatory reason for the discharge.
C) The burden remains with the plaintiff to prove discrimination beyond a reasonable doubt,a special standard in disparate-treatment cases.
D) The burden remains with the plaintiff to establish damages to a reasonable certainty.
E) The plaintiff wins.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Disabled Discrimination and Employment Act of 1967
B) Civil Rights Act of 1964
C) Americans with Disabilities Act
D) Sex Discrimination and Employment Act of 1967
E) Equal Pay Act of 1963
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No,Cindy will lose unless she can establish that she has a personality disorder because that is the only type of mental disability covered by the act.
B) No,Cindy will lose because mental disabilities are not covered under the act.
C) No,Cindy will lose unless at least until she can establish that she has been in counseling for at least six months because that is required in order to establish a mental disability under the act.
D) Yes,Cindy will likely win because mental disabilities are covered under the act,and she had the right to ask for anything that would help her.
E) No,Cindy will likely lose because she has no proof of a mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of her major life activities.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) There is a federal law specifically prohibiting employers from firing employees who smoke,but it does not address the hiring of those who smoke.
B) There is no federal law prohibiting employers from firing employees who smoke although some states have laws protecting rights of smokers.
C) There is a federal law specifically prohibiting employers from firing or from refusing to hire employees who smoke.
D) There is a federal law specifically prohibiting employers from firing employees who smoke and from refusing to hire employees who smoke,and it also requires that employers have a designated smoking area.
E) Neither federal nor state laws prohibit employers from firing employees who smoke.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) By a preponderance
B) A provable case
C) At first view
D) Beyond a reasonable doubt
E) Probable cause
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No,ABC Corporation would not have to provide Zeke with a private office because the act only contemplates accommodation through the placement of additional equipment to assist those with disabilities.
B) Yes,ABC Corporation would absolutely have to provide Zeke with a private office.
C) No,ABC Corporation would not have to provide Zeke with a private office because the only accommodation mandated for those with his condition is time off for counseling.
D) No,ABC Corporation would not have to provide Zeke with a private office because he is not covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act.
E) Yes,ABC Corporation would likely be required to provide Zeke with a private office unless the accommodation requested is not reasonable and would place an undue burden on the company.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The defendant does not have a burden,as it is the plaintiff's duty to establish his or her case.
B) The defendant must show that the alleged "business necessity" is not a mere pretext.
C) The defendant must articulate why the policy or practice is a "business necessity."
D) The defendant must articulate a legitimate,nondiscriminatory business reason for the action.
E) The defendant must articulate a reasonable business reason for the action.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Punitive damages are capped at $75,000 for employers of between 50 and 200 employees.
B) Punitive damages are capped at $300,000 for employers of more than 500 employees.
C) Punitive damages are capped at $50,000 for employers of between 100 and 200 employees.
D) Punitive damages are capped at $25,000 for employers of between 25 and 50 employees.
E) There is no cap on punitive damages.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) To eliminate situations in which women and also men were not paid equally for doing substantially the same job.
B) To eliminate situations in which women and men were being paid less that deserved for certain types of work.
C) To eliminate situations in which men,women,and those of a different national origin were denied overtime compensation and fair working conditions.
D) To eliminate situations in which both men and women were denied overtime compensation and fair working conditions.
E) To eliminate situations in which women,working alongside men or replacing men,would be paid lower wages for doing substantially the same job.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the plaintiff correctly made out her prima facie case through establishing that there was no basis upon which her termination could be legally based and that the male successor was hired almost immediately following her termination.
B) That the defendant was entitled to a judgment in its favor because a claim under the Equal Pay Act cannot be based on a male successor's pay rate.
C) That the defendant was entitled to a judgment in its favor because Title VII subsumed the provisions of the Equal Pay Act,and the plaintiff was required to name Title VII in her complaint.
D) That the plaintiff correctly made out her prima facie case by alleging the wage differential between her pay at termination and her successor's pay at the onset of his new position.
E) That the defendant was entitled to a judgment in its favor because it established that the plaintiff was fired for cause.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Restructured job
B) Less interaction with coworkers
C) Flexible work schedule
D) Time off work for treatment
E) A private office
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 90
Related Exams