Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

In the case of Schenck v.United States in 1919,Justice Holmes declared that government can limit speech if that speech provokes


A) a clear and present danger.
B) libel.
C) public demonstrations in opposition to the government.
D) Obscenity.
E) prior restraint.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In ________,the Court clarified its doctrine of what was obscene,including such gauges as whether material appealed to merely a prurient interest in sex,and whether it lacked serious artistic,literary,political,or scientific merit.


A) Osborne v. Ohio
B) Engel v. Vitale
C) Miller v. California
D) Near v. Minnesota
E) Federal Communications Commission v. Stern

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What was the significance of the Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Boumedine v.Bush?

Correct Answer

Answered by ExamLex AI

Answered by ExamLex AI

The Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Boume...

View Answer

The ________ is the final interpreter of the content and scope of Americans' civil liberties.


A) president
B) Congress
C) Supreme Court
D) American Civil Liberties Union
E) Constitution

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Supreme Court overturned restrictions on radio and television broadcasting in Red Lion Broadcasting Company v.Federal Communications Commission.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Explain the significance of Gitlow v.New York and the Fourteenth Amendment to the incorporation of the Bill of Rights.

Correct Answer

Answered by ExamLex AI

Answered by ExamLex AI

Gitlow v. New York was a landmark Suprem...

View Answer

How has the Court dealt with obscenity cases and the very definition of obscenity? Should obscenity be protected as freedom of expression,or should local communities be allowed to set standards of what is and is not obscene? Explain.

Correct Answer

Answered by ExamLex AI

Answered by ExamLex AI

The Court has dealt with obscenity cases...

View Answer

The Supreme Court's 1991 ruling that a coerced confession introduced during a trial does not automatically taint a conviction if it is a "harmless error" is an example of the Court's recent willingness to make exceptions to the requirements of


A) Miranda rights.
B) cruel and unusual punishment.
C) habeas corpus.
D) the exclusionary rule.
E) the right to privacy.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The abridgment of citizens' freedom to worship,or not to worship,as they please is prohibited by the


A) due process clause.
B) full faith and credit clause.
C) free exercise clause.
D) privileges and immunities clause.
E) establishment clause.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In its 2002 decision in Zelman v.Simmons-Harris,the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional to provide families with publicly funded vouchers that could be used to pay for tuition at religious schools.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Gitlow v New York (1925) ,the Court ruled that freedoms of speech and press were liberties protected by the ________ clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.


A) due process
B) necessary and proper
C) commerce
D) interstate commerce
E) free press

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v.Casey,the Supreme Court ruled that abortion


A) could be completely outlawed by individual states.
B) must be funded by state governments when the mother cannot afford it,or it would be a violation of the equal protection clause.
C) restrictions could be imposed by states if they did not involve "undue burdens" on the women seeking abortions.
D) funding by any level of government was unconstitutional.
E) was a fundamental right,and any restrictions on such a right had to be judged by a "strict scrutiny."

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty violates the equal protection of the law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Bill of Rights was adopted primarily in response to


A) the Spanish Inquisition.
B) British abuses of the colonists' civil liberties.
C) the abuses committed by the United States Continental Army during the Revolutionary War.
D) the horrors of the French Revolution.
E) Shays' Rebellion.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In the Lemon v.Kurtzman decision of 1971,the Supreme Court ruled that


A) any aid of any sort to church-related schools is not constitutional because it violates church-state separation.
B) aid to church-related schools is fully constitutional and can be used for any purposes needed by the schools.
C) spoken prayers in public schools were unconstitutional.
D) aid to church-related schools must be for secular purposes only and cannot be used to advance or inhibit religion.
E) devotional Bible reading in public schools was unconstitutional.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 121 - 135 of 135

Related Exams

Show Answer