A) Invalid
B) Conditional
C) Preventable
D) Temporary
E) Convertible
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) When the parties intend.
B) When a contract is made.
C) When physical possession is obtained.
D) Twenty-four hours after possession is obtained.
E) Three days after a contract is signed.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Once delivered a gift may be taken back by the person who gave the gift whereas that is not true when an item is purchased.
B) No consideration is needed for a gift.
C) No written contract is needed for a gift whereas it is needed for a purchase.
D) No certificate of title is needed for a gift whereas it is needed for a purchase.
E) Intent to permanently transfer title is irrelevant when gifts are concerned.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Lost
B) Mislaid
C) Discarded
D) Abandoned
E) Terminated
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Gifts may be conditional.
B) Gifts may not be conditional.
C) Gifts may be conditional only if a condition precedent is involved.
D) Gifts may be conditional only if consideration is present.
E) Gifts may be conditional only if one of the parties is related by blood or marriage.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The bailee is liable for harm to the bailed property arising out of the bailee's ordinary or gross negligence.
B) The bailee is liable for harm to the bailed property arising only out of the bailee's gross negligence.
C) The bailee is liable for harm to the bailed property caused by even the slightest lack of due care on the part of the bailee.
D) The bailee is strictly liable for harm to the bailed property.
E) The bailee is not liable for harm to the bailed property because of the doctrine of assumption of the risk.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That because no affirmative statement, either orally or in writing, was made expressing the plaintiff's intent to abandon the property, it would not be considered abandoned.
B) That because no affirmative written statement expressing the plaintiff's intent to abandon the property was made, it would not be considered abandoned.
C) That the plaintiff had sufficient time to remove the property once the court issued its writ of possession, the property was considered abandoned.
D) That regardless of the intent of the plaintiff, the property was considered abandoned based on the amount of money the plaintiff owed to the defendant.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Transferor
B) Transferee
C) Novator
D) Bailor
E) Bailee
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Bailments may be express but not implied.
B) Bailments may be implied but not express.
C) Bailments may be implied or express.
D) Bailments that are not express may be enforced as implied bailments only if a gratuitous bailment is involved.
E) Bailments that are not express may be enforced as implied bailments only if a mutual benefit bailment is involved.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Warehouse receipt
B) Delivery order
C) Receipt order
D) Negotiable receipt
E) Bill of lading
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A gift causa mortis.
B) A gift inter vivos.
C) A gift inter mortis.
D) A gift causa vivos.
E) It was meaningless because of the condition of death placed on the gift.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that a gift causa mortis was made because she died before requesting the return of the money and that the money therefore belonged to the son.
B) The court ruled that a gift causa mortis was made because the mother intended that the son keep the money if anything happened to her before or after the trip and that the money therefore belonged to the son.
C) The court ruled that a valid inter vivos gift was made because the mother never requested the return of the money and that the money therefore belonged to the son.
D) The court ruled than a valid inter vivos gift was made because the mother meant for the son to invest the money for her, retaining it if she died, and that the money therefore belonged to the son.
E) The court ruled that neither a valid causa mortis nor a valid inter vivos gift was made and that the funds were properly deducted from any distribution to the son or his heirs.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The right to possess the bailed property during the term of the bailment.
B) The right to use the property in a manner consistent with the terms and purpose of the bailment.
C) The right to alter the property in order to accomplish the reason for which the bailment was entered into.
D) The right to retain the bailed property until payment is received.
E) The right to receive compensation for the bailment unless the bailment is gratuitous.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 65
Related Exams